Lingual Traumatic Ulceration (Riga-Fede Disease): Report of a Case and Review

Authors

1 Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Dental Material Research Center, Faculty of Dentistry, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

2 Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Iran

3 Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Iran

4 Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran

Abstract

The term Riga-Fede disease has been used to describe chronic traumatic ulceration that occurs on the ventral surface of the tongue by natal and neonatal teeth in infants. It is important to diagnose the lesion and treat it by eliminating the source of trauma. In this case report, the neonatal tooth was extracted and after 2 weeks the lesion was resolved and the baby was feeding well.In addition, a review of dental and medical literature is included.

Keywords


Case Report

 

 


Lingual Traumatic Ulceration (Riga-Fede Disease): Report of a Case and Review

 

Iman Parisay1, Maryam Ghafournia2, Mina Shafagh3,

Seyed Ahmad Mousavi4

1 Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Dental Material Research Center, Faculty of Dentistry, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

2 Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Iran

3 Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Iran

4 Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran

 

Received 27 May 2013 and Accepted 10 August 2013



Abstract

The term Riga-Fede disease has been used to describe chronic traumatic ulceration that occurs on the ventral surface of the tongue by natal and neonatal teeth in infants. It is important to diagnose the lesion and treat it by eliminating the source of trauma. In this case report, the neonatal tooth was extracted and after 2 weeks the lesion was resolved and the baby was feeding well.In addition, a review of dental and medical literature is included.

 

Key words: Riga-Fede disease, natal teeth, neonatal teeth.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

-----------------------------------------------------

Parisay I, Ghafournia M, Shafagh M, Mousavi SA. Lingual Traumatic Ulceration (Riga-Fede Disease): Report of a Case and Review. J Dent Mater Tech 2013; 2(4): 142-7.

Introduction

Riga-Fede disease is a chronic, benign, ulcerative granulomatous process that occurs as a result of continuous trauma on the ventral surface of the tongue most commonly caused by neonatal or natal teeth in newborns (1,2). It may also be associated with repetitive tongue thrusting habits in older infants after the eruption of primary lower incisors (3). This condition has also been reported in children with familial dysautonomia (4).

The lesion was first described by Antonio Riga, an Italian physician in 1881. In 1890, Fede published the first histological studies. Subsequently, it was called "Riga-Fede disease" (5).

This condition may interfere with proper feeding which, in turn, may pose potential risks to infants due to nutritional deficiency. Consequently, proper dental management for these patients must be considered.

 

Case Report

A 38-day-old girl was referred to the Department of Pediatric Dentistry of Yazd University of Medical Sciences in June 2011, whose mother complaining of a lesion on the ventral surface of her tongue for 1 week. The mother stated that her baby had pain during suckling and could not be nursed well.

The medical history was not worthy of note. The infant’s development was normal and she had received all her scheduled vaccine shots.

Intraoral examination revealed one crown (tooth) in the anterior region of the mandibular arch. According to the mother, the tooth had erupted 10 days after birth. The neonatal tooth exhibited grade 2 mobility. The ventral surface of the tongue showeda 10mm×12mm ulcerationthat extended from the lingual frenum to the anterior border of the tongue (Fig. 1).

On palpation, the area elicited a pain response. There were no other lesions in any parts of the mouth. Based on the clinical findings, the diagnosis of Riga-Fede disease was made.

Because of the mobility of the neonatal tooth and the risk of aspiration, the extraction of neonatal toothwas considered as the treatment choice compared to more conservative alternatives.

There was no contraindication for extraction. The tooth was removed under topical anesthesia. In the 12-day recall, the lesion had healed completely. The mother was satisfied with the infant’s improved feeding (Fig. 2).

 

Review

A literature search was performed for all reported cases of Riga-Fede disease in the English literature of PubMed, Cochrane, Science direct, Google Scholar and Scopus databases. A summary of these case reports is shown in Table 1.

 

 

 

Figure 1. Riga-Fede lesion on the ventral surface of the tongue caused by neonatal tooth

 

 

 

Figure 2. The healed lesion 12 days after tooth extraction


 

 

 

Table 1. Summary of all reported cases of patients with Riga-Fede disease

Authors

Year

Gender

Age (Month)

Site

(NEO) Natal Teeth

Treatment

Amberg (6)

1902

M

7

sublingual

no

excision

Bray (6)

1927

M

9

sublingual

no

excision

Bradley (6)

1932

F

8

sublingual

no

excision

Moncrieff (6)

1933

M

6

sublingual

no

weaning

Newman  (6)

 

1935

M

M

6

8

sublingual

dorsum of tongue

no

no

smoothening lower incisors

extraction

Abramson (5)

 

1944

F

F

11

9

sublingual

sublingual

no

no

excision

excision

Jacobs (7)

1956

unknown

0.3

sublingual

yes

extraction

McDaniel et al (8)

1978

M

6

dorsum of tongue

no

excision

Rakocz(4)

 

1987

M

10

base and dorsum of  tongue

no

composite coverage incisors

Tomizawa et al (9)

1989

M

M

1

5

sublingual

sublingual

yes

yes

composite coverage incisors

composite coverage incisors

Eichenfield

 et al (10)

1990

F

6

sublingual

no

none

Goho (1)

 

1996

F

F

0.7

0.3

sublingual

sublingual

yes

yes

extraction

composite coverage incisors

Uzamiş (11)

1999

M

2

sublingual

yes

extraction

Slayton (3)

2000

M

10

sublingual

no

smoothening lower incisors

Toy (12)

 

2001

M

20

sublingual lower lip

no

unknown

Baghdadi (13)

 

2001

M

10

sublingual

no

smoothening lower incisors

topical corticosteroid

Baghdadi (14)

 

2002

F

12

sublingual

no

smoothening lower incisors

topical corticosteroid

Terzioğlu et al (15)

2002

M

7

sublingual

no

none

Zaenglein et al (2)

2002

M

10

tongue lower lip

no

unknown

Ahmet et al (16)

2003

F

9

sublingual

no

none

Hegde (17)

2005

F

1

sublingual

yes

extraction

Campos-Muñoz et al (18)

2006

M

11

sublingual

no

nasogastric feeding tube

Baroni et al  (19)

 

2006

M

11

sublingual

no

topical odontologic cream teething ring

Domingues-Cruz (20)

2007

M

24

lower lip

no

extraction

Narang et al (21)

 

2008

M

9

sublingual

no

teething ring

release of tongue tie

Jariwala et al (22)

2008

F

1.5

sublingual

yes

extraction

Ceyhan et al (23)

 

2009

M

15

sublingual

no

topical corticosteroid

Taghi et al (24)

2009

M

8

sublingual

no

composite coverage incisors

Choi et al (25)

2009

M

F

8

2

sublingual

sublingual

no

no

composite coverage incisors

smoothening incisal edges

Eley et al (26)

 

2010

F

11

sublingual

no

excision

Dubois et al (27)

2010

unknown

6

tongue lower lip

no

Unknown

Nagaveni et al (28)

 

2011

M

F

M

F

M

F

F

M

M

F

M

F

M

M

F

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

 

Unknown

unknown

unknown

unknown

sublingual

unknown

unknown

unknown

sublingual

unknown

unknown

unknown

unknown

sublingual

unknown

yes

yes

yes

yes

yes

yes

yes

yes

yes

yes

yes

yes

yes

yes

yes

 

extraction

extraction

extraction

extraction

vitamin K administration + extraction

extraction

extraction

extraction

extraction

extraction

extraction

extraction

vitamin K administration + extraction

extraction

extraction

Van der Meij

et al (6)

2012

M

6

sublingual

no

excision

Marie et al (29)

2012

F

10

lower lingual apex

no

unknown

Costacurta et al (30)

2012

F

2

ventral surface of the tongue

yes

extraction

Rachel Dunlop (31)

2013

F

2

anterior ventral tongue

yes

extraction

 

 


Discussion

The teeth observed at birth or during the first 30 days of life are called natal and neonatal teeth. In the past, this eruption anomaly was superstitiously associated with good or bad omens in the folklore. This explains the abundance of reports about this condition since 59 B.C., as observed in cuneiform inscriptions discovered in the 19th century (25).

Riga-Fede disease is initiated by the erosion produced by the sawing of the lingual frenum on the sharp, cutting edges of lower central incisors.With repeated trauma and secondary infection, granulation tissue forms and produces a tumor likemass, which is usually disc-shaped and about 1mm in diameter. In the center, there is usually an ulcerated area covered with fibrinous pseudomembrane. The lesion sometimes causes difficulty in nursing but there are no other symptoms. There is no associated lymphadenopathy or adjacent inflammation.

In this case report, Riga-Fede disease is associated with neonatal teeth and is similar to 29 cases which have been reported since 1902.

 According to all case reports of Riga-Fede disease since 1902 including ours, the most common site where the ulcer occurs, is the sublingual region of the mouth.

Treatment of the disease should begin conservatively and should focus on eliminating the source of trauma. Failure to diagnose and late treatment can result in dehydration and malnutrition. For traumatic lesions which have a clear irritating factor, the factor should be removed first. If healing does not occur after 2 weeks, biopsy is indicated (32).

There are several treatment options for Riga-Fede disease but conservative method was chosen as treatment option over extraction of the teeth. In the case of mild to moderate irritation to the tongue, a conservative approach such as smoothing the incisal edge with an abrasive instrument is advocated (17). Alternatively, a small increment of composite resin may be bonded to the incisal edges of the teeth (25). Among several reported cases since 1902, in 24 cases the teeth were extracted. Composite restoration and incisal edge smoothing were only performed in 6 and 5 cases, respectively. Because of the risk of aspiration and the difficulty of placing a compositerestoration, it seems that many clinicians prefer to extract the irritating teeth. In this case because of mobility of the tooth and the risk of aspiration, the tooth was extracted. In such a case; this procedure should not pose any difficulties since the teeth can be removed with the forceps or even with fingers. Defer the extraction until the 10th day of life to prevent hemorrhage andassess the need for administering vitamin K before the operation. This waiting period is necessary in order for the commensal flora of the intestine to establish and produce vitamin K as well as t for prothrombin production in the liver (33). For our 38-day patient, however, this waiting period was not necessary andtooth extraction was performed safely without the need for vitamin K administration. Two weeks after tooth extraction, the lesion was fully recovered and the infant was feeding normally.

 

References

  1. Goho C. Neonatal sublingual traumatic ulceration (Riga-Fede disease): Reports of cases. J Dent Child 1996;63:362-4.
  2. Zaenglein AL, Chang MW, Meehan SA, Axelrod FB, Orlow JR. Extensive Riga-Fede disease of the lip and tongue. J Am Acad Dermatol 2002;47:
    445-47.
  3. Slayton R. Treatment alternatives for sublingual traumatic ulceration (Riga-Fede disease). Fed Dent 2000;22:413-4.
  4. Rakocz M, Frand M, Brand N. Familial dysatonomia with Riga-Fede’s disease: report of case. J Dent Child 1987;54:57-9.
  5. Abramson M, Dowrie JO. Sublingual granuloma in infancy (Riga-Fede disease): reports of two cases. J Pediatr 1944;24:195-8.
  6. van der Meij EH, de Vries TW, Eggink HF, de Visscher JG. Traumatic lingual ulceration in a newborn: Riga-Fede disease. Ital J Pediatr 2012;38:20.
  7. Jacobs M. Oral lesions in childhood. Oral Surg 1956;9:871-81.
  8. McDaniel RK, Morano PD. Reparative lesion of the tongue. Oral Surg 1978;45:266–71.
  9. Tomizawa M, Yamada Y, Tonouchi K, Watanabe H, Noda T. Treatment of Riga-Fede's disease by resin-coverage of the incisal edges and seven cases of natal and neonatal teeth. Japanese J Pedodont 1989;27:182-90.
  10. Eichenfield LF, Honig PJ, Nelson L. Traumatic granuloma of the tongue (Riga-Fede disease): association with familial dysautonomia. J Pediatr 1990;116:742–4.
  11. Uzamiş M, Turgut M, Olmez S. Neonatal sublingual traumatic ulceration (Riga-Fede disease): a case report. Turk J Pediatr 1999;41:113–6.
  12. Toy BR. Congenital autonomic dysfunction with universal pain loss (Riga-Fede disease). Dermatol Online J 2001;7:17.
  13. Baghdadi ZD. Riga-Fede  Disease: Report of a case and review. J Cl Fed Dent 2001;25:209-13.
  14. Baghdadi ZD. Riga-Fede disease: association with microcephaly. Int J Paediatr Dent 2002;12:442–5.
  15. Terzioğlu A, Bingu F, Aslan G. Lingual traumatic ulceration (Riga-Fede disease). J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2002;60:478.
  16. Ahmet T, Ferruh B, Gurcan A. Lingual traumatic ulceration (Riga-Fede disease). Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2003;41:201.
  17. Hegde RJ. Sublingual traumatic ulceration due to neonatal teeth (Riga-Fede disease). J Indian Soc Pedo Prev Dent 2005;23:51–2.
  18. Campos-Muñoz L, Quesada-Cortés A, Corral-De la Calle M, et al. Tongue ulcer in a child: Riga-Fede disease. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2006;20:1357–9.
  19. Baroni A, Capristo C, Rossiello L, Faccenda F, Satriano RA. Lingual traumatic ulceration (Riga-Fede disease). Int J Dermatol 2006;45:1096–7.
  20. Domingues-Cruz J, Herrera A, Fernandez-Crehuet P, Garcia-Bravo B, Camacho F. Riga-Fede disease associated with postanoxicen cephalopathy and trisomy 21: a proposed classification. Pediatr Dermatol 2007;24:663–5.
  21. Narang T, De D, Kanwar AJ. Riga-Fede disease: trauma due to teeth ortongue tie? J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2008;22:395–6.
  22. Jariwala D, Graham RM, Lewis T. Riga-Fede disease. Br Dent J 2008;204:171.
  23. Ceyhan AM, Yildirim M, Basak PY, Akkaya VB, Ayata A. Traumatic lingualulcer in a child. Clin Exp Dermatol 2009; 34:186–8.
  24. Taghi A, Motamedi MHK. Riga-Fede disease: a histological study and casereport. Indian J Dent Res 2009; 20:227–9.
  25. Choi SC, Park JH, Choi YC, Kim GT. Sublingual traumatic ulceration (a Riga-Fede disease): report of two cases. Dent Traumatol 2009;25:48–50.
  26. Eley KA, Watt-Smith PA, Watt-Smith SR. Deformity of the tongue in an infant: Riga- Fede disease. Paediatr Child Health 2010;15:581–2.
  27. Dubois L, Keuning KH, Lindeboom JA. Traumatic ulceration of the tongue in an infant. Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd 2010;117:274-5.
  28. Nagaveni N, Basavanthappa A, Umashankara KB, Radhika N, Basavanthappa C, Satisha TS. Natal and neonatal teeth: aretrospective study of 15 cases. Eur J Dent 2011;5:168–72.
  29. Marie J, Fricain JC, Boralevi F. Riga-Fede disease. Ann Dermatol Venereol 2012;139:546-9.
  30. Costacurta M, Maturo P, Docimo R. Riga-Fede disease and neonatal teeth. Oral Implantol (Rome) 2012;5:26-30.
  31. Dunlop R, Barton D, Jones J. Riga-Fede disease: a case report. J Pediatr Health Care 2013;27:155-7.
  32. Nevile BW, Damm DD, Allen CM, Bouquot JE. Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology. St. Louis: WB Saunders, 2002.
  33. Cunha RF. Natal and neonatal teeth: review of literature. Ped Dent 2001;33:158-62.


 

 

Corresponding Author:

Iman Parisay

Faculty of Dentistry

Vakilabad Blvd, Mashhad, Iran

P.O. Box: 91735-984

Tel: +989153132816

Fax: +98-511-8829500

E-mail: Parisayi@mums.ac.ir & Dr.imanparissay@yahoo.com

 

  1. Goho C. Neonatal sublingual traumatic ulceration (Riga-Fede disease): Reports of cases. J Dent Child 1996;63:362-4.
  2. Zaenglein AL, Chang MW, Meehan SA, Axelrod FB, Orlow JR. Extensive Riga-Fede disease of the lip and tongue. J Am Acad Dermatol 2002;47:
    445-47.
  3. Slayton R. Treatment alternatives for sublingual traumatic ulceration (Riga-Fede disease). Fed Dent 2000;22:413-4.
  4. Rakocz M, Frand M, Brand N. Familial dysatonomia with Riga-Fede’s disease: report of case. J Dent Child 1987;54:57-9.
  5. Abramson M, Dowrie JO. Sublingual granuloma in infancy (Riga-Fede disease): reports of two cases. J Pediatr 1944;24:195-8.
  6. van der Meij EH, de Vries TW, Eggink HF, de Visscher JG. Traumatic lingual ulceration in a newborn: Riga-Fede disease. Ital J Pediatr 2012;38:20.
  7. Jacobs M. Oral lesions in childhood. Oral Surg 1956;9:871-81.
  8. McDaniel RK, Morano PD. Reparative lesion of the tongue. Oral Surg 1978;45:266–71.
  9. Tomizawa M, Yamada Y, Tonouchi K, Watanabe H, Noda T. Treatment of Riga-Fede's disease by resin-coverage of the incisal edges and seven cases of natal and neonatal teeth. Japanese J Pedodont 1989;27:182-90.
  10. Eichenfield LF, Honig PJ, Nelson L. Traumatic granuloma of the tongue (Riga-Fede disease): association with familial dysautonomia. J Pediatr 1990;116:742–4.
  11. Uzamiş M, Turgut M, Olmez S. Neonatal sublingual traumatic ulceration (Riga-Fede disease): a case report. Turk J Pediatr 1999;41:113–6.
  12. Toy BR. Congenital autonomic dysfunction with universal pain loss (Riga-Fede disease). Dermatol Online J 2001;7:17.
  13. Baghdadi ZD. Riga-Fede  Disease: Report of a case and review. J Cl Fed Dent 2001;25:209-13.
  14. Baghdadi ZD. Riga-Fede disease: association with microcephaly. Int J Paediatr Dent 2002;12:442–5.
  15. Terzioğlu A, Bingu F, Aslan G. Lingual traumatic ulceration (Riga-Fede disease). J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2002;60:478.
  16. Ahmet T, Ferruh B, Gurcan A. Lingual traumatic ulceration (Riga-Fede disease). Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2003;41:201.
  17. Hegde RJ. Sublingual traumatic ulceration due to neonatal teeth (Riga-Fede disease). J Indian Soc Pedo Prev Dent 2005;23:51–2.
  18. Campos-Muñoz L, Quesada-Cortés A, Corral-De la Calle M, et al. Tongue ulcer in a child: Riga-Fede disease. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2006;20:1357–9.
  19. Baroni A, Capristo C, Rossiello L, Faccenda F, Satriano RA. Lingual traumatic ulceration (Riga-Fede disease). Int J Dermatol 2006;45:1096–7.
  20. Domingues-Cruz J, Herrera A, Fernandez-Crehuet P, Garcia-Bravo B, Camacho F. Riga-Fede disease associated with postanoxicen cephalopathy and trisomy 21: a proposed classification. Pediatr Dermatol 2007;24:663–5.
  21. Narang T, De D, Kanwar AJ. Riga-Fede disease: trauma due to teeth ortongue tie? J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2008;22:395–6.
  22. Jariwala D, Graham RM, Lewis T. Riga-Fede disease. Br Dent J 2008;204:171.
  23. Ceyhan AM, Yildirim M, Basak PY, Akkaya VB, Ayata A. Traumatic lingualulcer in a child. Clin Exp Dermatol 2009; 34:186–8.
  24. Taghi A, Motamedi MHK. Riga-Fede disease: a histological study and casereport. Indian J Dent Res 2009; 20:227–9.
  25. Choi SC, Park JH, Choi YC, Kim GT. Sublingual traumatic ulceration (a Riga-Fede disease): report of two cases. Dent Traumatol 2009;25:48–50.
  26. Eley KA, Watt-Smith PA, Watt-Smith SR. Deformity of the tongue in an infant: Riga- Fede disease. Paediatr Child Health 2010;15:581–2.
  27. Dubois L, Keuning KH, Lindeboom JA. Traumatic ulceration of the tongue in an infant. Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd 2010;117:274-5.
  28. Nagaveni N, Basavanthappa A, Umashankara KB, Radhika N, Basavanthappa C, Satisha TS. Natal and neonatal teeth: aretrospective study of 15 cases. Eur J Dent 2011;5:168–72.
  29. Marie J, Fricain JC, Boralevi F. Riga-Fede disease. Ann Dermatol Venereol 2012;139:546-9.
  30. Costacurta M, Maturo P, Docimo R. Riga-Fede disease and neonatal teeth. Oral Implantol (Rome) 2012;5:26-30.
  31. Dunlop R, Barton D, Jones J. Riga-Fede disease: a case report. J Pediatr Health Care 2013;27:155-7.
  32. Nevile BW, Damm DD, Allen CM, Bouquot JE. Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology. St. Louis: WB Saunders, 2002.
  33. Cunha RF. Natal and neonatal teeth: review of literature. Ped Dent 2001;33:158-62.