<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
			<journal>
			<title>Journal of Dental Materials and Techniques</title>
			<title_fa></title_fa>
			<short_title>JDMT</short_title>
			<subject>Medical Sciences</subject>
			<web_url>https://jdmt.mums.ac.ir/</web_url>
			<journal_hbi_system_id>0</journal_hbi_system_id>
			<journal_hbi_system_user></journal_hbi_system_user>
			<journal_id_issn>2322-4150</journal_id_issn>
			<journal_id_issn_online>2252-0317</journal_id_issn_online>
			<journal_id_pii></journal_id_pii>
			<journal_id_doi></journal_id_doi>
			<journal_id_iranmedex></journal_id_iranmedex>
			<journal_id_magiran></journal_id_magiran>
			<journal_id_sid></journal_id_sid>
			<journal_id_nlai></journal_id_nlai>
			<journal_id_science></journal_id_science>
			<language>en</language>
			<pubdate>
				<type>jalali</type>
				<year>2025</year>
				<month>6</month>
				<day>1</day>
			</pubdate>
			<pubdate>
				<type>gregorian</type>
				<year>2025</year>
				<month>6</month>
				<day>1</day>
			</pubdate>
			<volume>14</volume>
			<number>2</number>
			<publish_type>online</publish_type>
			<publish_edition>1</publish_edition>
			<article_type>fulltext</article_type>
			<articleset><article>
				<language>en</language>
				<article_id_issn></article_id_issn>
				<article_id_issn_online></article_id_issn_online>
				<article_id_pubmed></article_id_pubmed>
				<article_id_pii></article_id_pii>
				<article_id_doi></article_id_doi>
				<article_id_iranmedex></article_id_iranmedex>
				<article_id_magiran></article_id_magiran>
				<article_id_sid></article_id_sid>
				<title_fa></title_fa>
				<title>Effect of nano-hydroxyapatite incorporation on the immediate and long-term bond stability of a one-step self-etch adhesive</title>
				<subject_fa></subject_fa>
				<subject></subject>
				<content_type_fa></content_type_fa>
				<content_type>Original Article</content_type>
				<abstract_fa><![CDATA[]]></abstract_fa>
				<abstract><![CDATA[Objective: This study evaluated the effect of incorporating nano-hydroxyapatite (nHAp) at various concentrations on the immediate and long-term bond strength of a one-step self-etch adhesive to dentin.Methods: A total of 100 sound maxillary central incisors were collected. The dentin was exposed on the labial surfaces, and the teeth were randomly assigned into two groups (n=50) based on the evaluation time points: 24 hours and 6 months. Each group was further divided into five subgroups (n=10) based on the concentration of nHAp (0, 1, 2, 3, and 4 wt%) incorporated into Adper Single Bond Universal adhesive. Composite resin buildups were formed on dentin using cylindrical molds, and light-cured. Shear bond strength (SBS) was measured by a universal testing machine, and fracture modes were assessed under a stereomicroscope. Statistical analysis was performed using a two-way ANOVA (P&lt;0.05).Results: At 24 hours, the highest bond strength was observed in 2% nHAp (41.68 ± 15.24 MPa), followed by 1% nHAp (36.75 ± 14.24 MPa), both significantly greater than the control group (0% nHAp: 17.03 ± 4.57 MPa; P &lt; 0.05). After 6 months, 2% nHAp again demonstrated the highest bond strength (43.28 ± 6.87 MPa), followed by 1% nHAp (37.00 ± 6.90 MPa), both significantly higher than the control (15.28 ± 4.63) and 4% nHAp groups (14.58 ± 2.33 MPa; P&lt;0.05).Conclusions: The incorporation of nano-hydroxyapatite at concentrations up to 2 wt% into a one-step self-etch adhesive significantly enhanced both immediate and long-term bond strength to dentin.]]></abstract>
				<keyword_fa></keyword_fa>
				<keyword>Adper single bond, Bond Strength, Composite resins, dental cement, dentin bonding agents, Nano-hydroxyapatite</keyword>
				<start_page>57</start_page>
				<end_page>63</end_page>
				<web_url>https://jdmt.mums.ac.ir/article_26193.html</web_url>
			<author_list><author>
				<first_name>Bhanu</first_name>
				<middle_name>Pratap</middle_name>
				<last_name>Pratap Valluri</last_name>
				<suffix></suffix>
				<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
				<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
				<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
				<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
				<email>bhanupratapv1988@gmail.com</email>
				<code>114986</code>
				<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
				<affiliation>Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Vishnu Dentall College and Hospital, Bhimavaram, Andhra Pradesh, India</affiliation>
				<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
				 </author><author>
				<first_name>Madhu Varma</first_name>
				<middle_name></middle_name>
				<last_name>Kanumuri</last_name>
				<suffix></suffix>
				<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
				<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
				<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
				<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
				<email>madhuvarma27@gmail.com</email>
				<code>114987</code>
				<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
				<affiliation>Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Vishnu Dentall College and Hospital, Bhimavaram, Andhra Pradesh, India</affiliation>
				<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
				 </author><author>
				<first_name>Girija</first_name>
				<middle_name></middle_name>
				<last_name>Sajjan</last_name>
				<suffix></suffix>
				<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
				<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
				<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
				<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
				<email>girijasajjan@vdc.edu.in</email>
				<code>114988</code>
				<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
				<affiliation>Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Vishnu Dentall College and Hospital, Bhimavaram, Andhra Pradesh, India</affiliation>
				<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
				 </author><author>
				<first_name>Kalyan Satish</first_name>
				<middle_name></middle_name>
				<last_name>Rajulapati</last_name>
				<suffix></suffix>
				<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
				<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
				<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
				<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
				<email>rkalyansatish@vdc.edu.in</email>
				<code>114989</code>
				<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
				<affiliation>Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Vishnu Dentall College and Hospital, Bhimavaram, Andhra Pradesh, India</affiliation>
				<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
				 </author><author>
				<first_name>Venkata Karteek</first_name>
				<middle_name></middle_name>
				<last_name>Varma Penmatsa</last_name>
				<suffix></suffix>
				<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
				<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
				<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
				<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
				<email>karteekvarma@vdc.edu.in</email>
				<code>114990</code>
				<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
				<affiliation>Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Vishnu Dentall College and Hospital, Bhimavaram, Andhra Pradesh, India</affiliation>
				<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
				 </author><author>
				<first_name>Jagapathi</first_name>
				<middle_name></middle_name>
				<last_name>Babu Mavidi</last_name>
				<suffix></suffix>
				<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
				<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
				<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
				<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
				<email>jagapathibabu.mavidi@vdc.edu.in</email>
				<code>114991</code>
				<coreauthor>Yes</coreauthor>
				<affiliation>Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Vishnu Dentall College and Hospital, Bhimavaram, Andhra Pradesh, India</affiliation>
				<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
				 </author></author_list>
				</article><article>
				<language>en</language>
				<article_id_issn></article_id_issn>
				<article_id_issn_online></article_id_issn_online>
				<article_id_pubmed></article_id_pubmed>
				<article_id_pii></article_id_pii>
				<article_id_doi></article_id_doi>
				<article_id_iranmedex></article_id_iranmedex>
				<article_id_magiran></article_id_magiran>
				<article_id_sid></article_id_sid>
				<title_fa></title_fa>
				<title>Antimicrobial properties of novel dental bioceramic sealers and conventional sealers against Enterococcus faecalis</title>
				<subject_fa></subject_fa>
				<subject></subject>
				<content_type_fa></content_type_fa>
				<content_type>Original Article</content_type>
				<abstract_fa><![CDATA[]]></abstract_fa>
				<abstract><![CDATA[Objective: This study aimed to evaluate and compare the antimicrobial properties of two newly formulated tricalcium silicate-based (TCS) bioceramic sealers with those of two commercially available sealers against Enterococcus faecalis.Methods: The antibacterial properties of four sealers were tested: TCS sealer, TCS-Amo (containing amoxicillin), Pulpdent and Endoseal MTA. Antibacterial activity was assessed using the agar diffusion test (ADT) and direct contact test (DCT) at four different time intervals: immediately after setting (T0), 24 hours (T1), 72 hours (T3) and 168 hours (T7). In the ADT, antibacterial activity was determined by measuring the diameter (mm) of the zone of inhibition (ZOI). In the DCT, results were expressed as mean bacterial viability (CFU/mL). Statistical analysis was conducted using two-way ANOVA (P&lt;0.05).Results: According to the ADT results, ZOI diameters in the TCS and TCS-Amo groups increased significantly over time (P&lt;0.001). These two groups also demonstrated significantly larger ZOI values at T0, T3, and T7 compared to the other groups (P&lt;0.05). In the DCT, bacterial viability in the TCS and TCS-Amo groups increased significantly over time (P&lt;0.001). The experimental sealers showed significantly lower bacterial viability than Endoseal MTA at the early time points (T0 and T1), but higher viability at the later stages (T3 and T7) (P&lt;0.05).Conclusion: The TCS and TCS-Amo sealers exhibited strong antibacterial activity in the ADT, with TCS-Amo showing the highest efficacy on day 7. However, their effectiveness declined over time in the DCT, indicating limited long-term antimicrobial activity against E.faecalis.]]></abstract>
				<keyword_fa></keyword_fa>
				<keyword>Agar diffusion test, Antibacterial agents, Bioceramics, Enterococcus faecalis, Root canal sealants, Silicates</keyword>
				<start_page>64</start_page>
				<end_page>71</end_page>
				<web_url>https://jdmt.mums.ac.ir/article_26197.html</web_url>
			<author_list><author>
				<first_name>Soroush</first_name>
				<middle_name></middle_name>
				<last_name>Maleki</last_name>
				<suffix></suffix>
				<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
				<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
				<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
				<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
				<email>20soroushmaleki00@gmail.com</email>
				<code>115004</code>
				<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
				<affiliation>Dental Materials Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.</affiliation>
				<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
				 </author><author>
				<first_name>Hossein</first_name>
				<middle_name></middle_name>
				<last_name>Bagheri</last_name>
				<suffix></suffix>
				<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
				<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
				<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
				<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
				<email>bagherih@mums.ac.ir</email>
				<code>115005</code>
				<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
				<affiliation>Dental Materials Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran</affiliation>
				<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
				 </author><author>
				<first_name>Maryam</first_name>
				<middle_name></middle_name>
				<last_name>Javididashtbayaz</last_name>
				<suffix></suffix>
				<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
				<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
				<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
				<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
				<email>javidim@mums.ac.ir</email>
				<code>115006</code>
				<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
				<affiliation>Dental Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.</affiliation>
				<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
				 </author><author>
				<first_name>Mohammad</first_name>
				<middle_name></middle_name>
				<last_name>Jalilinik</last_name>
				<suffix></suffix>
				<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
				<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
				<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
				<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
				<email>jalilinm@mums.ac.ir</email>
				<code>115007</code>
				<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
				<affiliation>Dental Materials Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.</affiliation>
				<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
				 </author><author>
				<first_name>Azadeh</first_name>
				<middle_name></middle_name>
				<last_name>Saberi</last_name>
				<suffix></suffix>
				<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
				<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
				<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
				<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
				<email>azi.saberi@gmail.com</email>
				<code>115008</code>
				<coreauthor>Yes</coreauthor>
				<affiliation>Dental Materials Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.</affiliation>
				<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
				 </author></author_list>
				</article><article>
				<language>en</language>
				<article_id_issn></article_id_issn>
				<article_id_issn_online></article_id_issn_online>
				<article_id_pubmed></article_id_pubmed>
				<article_id_pii></article_id_pii>
				<article_id_doi></article_id_doi>
				<article_id_iranmedex></article_id_iranmedex>
				<article_id_magiran></article_id_magiran>
				<article_id_sid></article_id_sid>
				<title_fa></title_fa>
				<title>Effect of internal taper of endocrown preparation on the adaptation of 3D-printed restorations</title>
				<subject_fa></subject_fa>
				<subject></subject>
				<content_type_fa></content_type_fa>
				<content_type>Original Article</content_type>
				<abstract_fa><![CDATA[]]></abstract_fa>
				<abstract><![CDATA[Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the influence of different internal taper angles in endocrown preparations on the marginal and internal adaptation of 3D-printed restorations.Methods: Three standardized mandibular first molar models were prepared with internal taper angles of 6°, 10°, and 22°. Each model was scanned 12 times, and endocrown restorations were digitally designed and fabricated with a 3D printer using Freeprint® Temp resin. All restorations were seated by a single operator, and the adjustment time and frequency were recorded. Adaptation was assessed using the replica technique, and marginal, axial, pulpal, and axio-pulpal line angle gaps were measured under a stereomicroscope. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s post-hoc test at the significance level of P&lt;0.05.Results: The pulpal gap was significantly larger in the 22° taper group compared to both the 6° (P&lt;0.001) and 10° (P=0.001) groups. The 6° taper group exhibited significantly greater marginal misfit than the 10° (P=0.035) and 22° (P=0.021) groups. The axio-pulpal line angle misfit was significantly higher in the 22° taper group than in the 6° group (P=0.016). No significant difference was observed in axial misfit among the groups (P=0.169). Notably, the 22° taper group required significantly less adjustment time and fewer adjustment attempts than the other groups (P&lt;0.05).Conclusions: All three taper angles yielded restorations with clinically acceptable adaptation. Increasing the internal taper from 6° to 22° improved marginal fit and reduced clinical chairside adjustments; however, it resulted in a deterioration of pulpal adaptation.]]></abstract>
				<keyword_fa></keyword_fa>
				<keyword>Dental Marginal adaptation, Dental preparation, dental prosthesis, Permanent dental restoration, Temporary dental restoration, Three-dimensional printing</keyword>
				<start_page>72</start_page>
				<end_page>79</end_page>
				<web_url>https://jdmt.mums.ac.ir/article_26199.html</web_url>
			<author_list><author>
				<first_name>Mahdi</first_name>
				<middle_name></middle_name>
				<last_name>Zerafat</last_name>
				<suffix></suffix>
				<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
				<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
				<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
				<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
				<email>mahdizerafat1375@gmail.com</email>
				<code>115013</code>
				<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
				<affiliation>School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran</affiliation>
				<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
				 </author><author>
				<first_name>Marzieh</first_name>
				<middle_name></middle_name>
				<last_name>Alikhasi</last_name>
				<suffix></suffix>
				<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
				<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
				<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
				<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
				<email>malikhasi@razi.tums.ac.ir</email>
				<code>115014</code>
				<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
				<affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.</affiliation>
				<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
				 </author><author>
				<first_name>Negin</first_name>
				<middle_name></middle_name>
				<last_name>Yaghoobi</last_name>
				<suffix></suffix>
				<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
				<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
				<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
				<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
				<email>neginya1991@gmail.com</email>
				<code>115015</code>
				<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
				<affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran</affiliation>
				<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
				 </author><author>
				<first_name>Nikfam</first_name>
				<middle_name></middle_name>
				<last_name>Khoshkhounejad</last_name>
				<suffix></suffix>
				<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
				<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
				<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
				<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
				<email>n.khoshkhounejad@gmail.com</email>
				<code>115016</code>
				<coreauthor>Yes</coreauthor>
				<affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.</affiliation>
				<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
				 </author></author_list>
				</article><article>
				<language>en</language>
				<article_id_issn></article_id_issn>
				<article_id_issn_online></article_id_issn_online>
				<article_id_pubmed></article_id_pubmed>
				<article_id_pii></article_id_pii>
				<article_id_doi></article_id_doi>
				<article_id_iranmedex></article_id_iranmedex>
				<article_id_magiran></article_id_magiran>
				<article_id_sid></article_id_sid>
				<title_fa></title_fa>
				<title>Effect of digital bite registration condition and scanner type on the accuracy of 3D printed occlusal splints</title>
				<subject_fa></subject_fa>
				<subject></subject>
				<content_type_fa></content_type_fa>
				<content_type>Original Article</content_type>
				<abstract_fa><![CDATA[]]></abstract_fa>
				<abstract><![CDATA[Objective: The present study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of occlusal splints created at different bite registration conditions using two intraoral scanners.Methods: Dental arches were mounted in the maximum intercuspation position and scanned using Trios 3 and Medit i700 scanners under three conditions: closed mouth position, and open bite to 4 mm with or without bite registration material. Eight splints were printed for each bite registration mode and scanner type (total=48), using a Phrozen 3D printer. The splints were placed on the model and scanned using a desktop scanner. The scans were superimposed on the digital file of the designed splint. The root mean square (RMS) deviation was calculated to represent the discrepancy between the designed and printed splints. The distance between the splint and the mandibular teeth was also measured. Data analysis was performed using a two-way ANOVA (α=0.05).Results: Bite registration mode did not affect the RMS and the distance between the splint and the mandibular teeth (P&gt;0.05). The scanner type did not influence the RMS values and posterior and total distance between the splint and the mandibular teeth (P&gt;0.05). However, using the Trios 3 scanner led to a significantly greater distance between the splint and the mandibular teeth in the anterior region compared to that of the Medit i700 scanner (P=0.016).Conclusions: Bite registration condition did not affect the accuracy of occlusal splints. Splints fabricated with the Medit i700 scanner had a better anterior fit than those scanned with the Trios 3 scanner.]]></abstract>
				<keyword_fa></keyword_fa>
				<keyword>Bite registration, CAD-CAM, Oral scanner, Occlusal splints, Three-dimensional printing</keyword>
				<start_page>80</start_page>
				<end_page>87</end_page>
				<web_url>https://jdmt.mums.ac.ir/article_26202.html</web_url>
			<author_list><author>
				<first_name>Amirtaher</first_name>
				<middle_name></middle_name>
				<last_name>Mirmortazavi</last_name>
				<suffix></suffix>
				<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
				<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
				<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
				<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
				<email>mirmortazaviat@mums.ac.ir</email>
				<code>115025</code>
				<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
				<affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.</affiliation>
				<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
				 </author><author>
				<first_name>Azam Sadat</first_name>
				<middle_name></middle_name>
				<last_name>Madani</last_name>
				<suffix></suffix>
				<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
				<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
				<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
				<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
				<email>madania@mums.ac.ir</email>
				<code>115026</code>
				<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
				<affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.</affiliation>
				<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
				 </author><author>
				<first_name>Sajjad</first_name>
				<middle_name></middle_name>
				<last_name>Alipour Hedayatabad</last_name>
				<suffix></suffix>
				<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
				<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
				<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
				<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
				<email>alipoursajjad91@yahoo.com</email>
				<code>115027</code>
				<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
				<affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.</affiliation>
				<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
				 </author><author>
				<first_name>Melika</first_name>
				<middle_name></middle_name>
				<last_name>Hoseinzadeh</last_name>
				<suffix></suffix>
				<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
				<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
				<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
				<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
				<email>hoseinzadehmel@gmail.com</email>
				<code>115028</code>
				<coreauthor>Yes</coreauthor>
				<affiliation>Dental Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran</affiliation>
				<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
				 </author></author_list>
				</article><article>
				<language>en</language>
				<article_id_issn></article_id_issn>
				<article_id_issn_online></article_id_issn_online>
				<article_id_pubmed></article_id_pubmed>
				<article_id_pii></article_id_pii>
				<article_id_doi></article_id_doi>
				<article_id_iranmedex></article_id_iranmedex>
				<article_id_magiran></article_id_magiran>
				<article_id_sid></article_id_sid>
				<title_fa></title_fa>
				<title>Low-level laser therapy for the regeneration of mandibular bone defects in rabbits</title>
				<subject_fa></subject_fa>
				<subject></subject>
				<content_type_fa></content_type_fa>
				<content_type>Original Article</content_type>
				<abstract_fa><![CDATA[]]></abstract_fa>
				<abstract><![CDATA[Objective: This study aimed to assess the effect of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) on the regeneration of mandibular bone defects in rabbits.Methods: This animal study was conducted on 14 male albino rabbits. Two circular defects 5 mm in diameter were created bilaterally at the angles of the mandible. One side was randomly selected to undergo laser therapy at a wavelength of 905 nm and a power of 20 mW for 2 minutes daily, starting immediately after surgery. The other side served as the sham-irradiated control. Half of the rabbits were sacrificed on day 8, and the other half on day 15. The mandibles of sacrificed animals were resected and subjected to histopathological analysis to measure the percentage of mineralized bone, osteoid matrix and fibrous tissue as well as the number of blood vessels (as the indicator of angiogenesis), fibroblasts, and inflammatory cells. Data were analyzed by paired t-test and independent samples t-test at the significance level of P&lt;0.05.Results: No statistically significant differences were observed between the laser-treated and control sides in any of the measured histopathological parameters at either the 8-day or 15-day time points (P&gt;0.05). On the laser side, a significant increase was observed in the mean percentage of mineralized bone (P=0.022) and osteoid matrix (P=0.002) from day 8 to day 15. The control side revealed no significant changes in the evaluated parameters over time (P&gt;0.05).Conclusions: Low-level laser irradiation may accelerate the regeneration of mandibular bone defects in rabbits.]]></abstract>
				<keyword_fa></keyword_fa>
				<keyword>Biostimulation, bone defect, bone regeneration, Laser therapy, Low-level laser, Osteogenesis</keyword>
				<start_page>88</start_page>
				<end_page>94</end_page>
				<web_url>https://jdmt.mums.ac.ir/article_26209.html</web_url>
			<author_list><author>
				<first_name>Ali</first_name>
				<middle_name></middle_name>
				<last_name>Peimani</last_name>
				<suffix></suffix>
				<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
				<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
				<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
				<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
				<email>alipeimani2001@yahoo.com</email>
				<code>115059</code>
				<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
				<affiliation>Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, Iran.</affiliation>
				<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
				 </author><author>
				<first_name>Maryam</first_name>
				<middle_name></middle_name>
				<last_name>Irannezhad</last_name>
				<suffix></suffix>
				<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
				<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
				<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
				<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
				<email>irannezhad.maryam@yahoo.com</email>
				<code>115060</code>
				<coreauthor>Yes</coreauthor>
				<affiliation>Faculty of Dentistry, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.</affiliation>
				<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
				 </author><author>
				<first_name>Salim</first_name>
				<middle_name></middle_name>
				<last_name>Kiani</last_name>
				<suffix></suffix>
				<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
				<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
				<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
				<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
				<email>salimkiani7@gmail.com</email>
				<code>115061</code>
				<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
				<affiliation>Faculty of Dentistry, Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, Iran.</affiliation>
				<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
				 </author><author>
				<first_name>Moein</first_name>
				<middle_name></middle_name>
				<last_name>Arman</last_name>
				<suffix></suffix>
				<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
				<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
				<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
				<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
				<email>moein.arman@gmail.com</email>
				<code>115062</code>
				<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
				<affiliation>Department of Veterinary Medicine, Garmsar Islamic Azad University, Semnan, Iran.</affiliation>
				<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
				 </author><author>
				<first_name>Morteza</first_name>
				<middle_name></middle_name>
				<last_name>Khademalhosseini</last_name>
				<suffix></suffix>
				<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
				<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
				<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
				<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
				<email>meceu85@gmail.com</email>
				<code>115063</code>
				<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
				<affiliation>Department of Clinical and Surgical Pathology, Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, Iran</affiliation>
				<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
				 </author></author_list>
				</article><article>
				<language>en</language>
				<article_id_issn></article_id_issn>
				<article_id_issn_online></article_id_issn_online>
				<article_id_pubmed></article_id_pubmed>
				<article_id_pii></article_id_pii>
				<article_id_doi></article_id_doi>
				<article_id_iranmedex></article_id_iranmedex>
				<article_id_magiran></article_id_magiran>
				<article_id_sid></article_id_sid>
				<title_fa></title_fa>
				<title>Comparative assessment of the fracture resistance of endocrowns fabricated from three different CAD/CAM ceramic blocks</title>
				<subject_fa></subject_fa>
				<subject></subject>
				<content_type_fa></content_type_fa>
				<content_type>Original Article</content_type>
				<abstract_fa><![CDATA[]]></abstract_fa>
				<abstract><![CDATA[Objective: This study aimed to compare the fracture resistance of endocrowns fabricated from three different computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) ceramic materials.Methods: A maxillary left first molar of a typodont model was scanned using an intraoral scanner both before and after standardized endocrown preparation. The scan of the prepared tooth was used to fabricate thirty-six identical resin dies through three-dimensional printing. These dies were then assigned to three groups (n=12), each corresponding to a different CAD/CAM ceramic material: IPS e.max CAD, VITA Suprinity, and VITA Enamic. Endocrowns were digitally designed and milled for each group using a CAD/CAM system. They were then cemented onto the resin dies with dual-cure resin cement and subjected to 5000 thermal cycles. A compressive load was applied to each specimen at a 35° angle to the palatal cusp using a universal testing machine until fracture occurred. Fracture resistance values were recorded in Newtons, and failure modes were evaluated by a stereomicroscope. Statistical analysis was performed using the Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney U, and Bonferroni tests (P&lt;0.05).Results: A statistically significant difference was found in the fracture resistance among the three groups (P=0.01). The IPS e.max CAD group exhibited significantly higher fracture resistance compared to the VITA Enamic group (P=0.01). No statistically significant difference was observed in failure modes across the groups (P&gt;0.05).Conclusions: Endocrowns fabricated from IPS e.max CAD demonstrated the highest fracture resistance with no cases of catastrophic failure. VITA Suprinity endocrowns showed the second-highest fracture resistance, with only one case of catastrophic fracture.]]></abstract>
				<keyword_fa></keyword_fa>
				<keyword>Computer-Aided Design, dental porcelain, dental prosthesis, Dental Restoration Failure, fracture resistance, IPS e.max ceram</keyword>
				<start_page>95</start_page>
				<end_page>101</end_page>
				<web_url>https://jdmt.mums.ac.ir/article_26206.html</web_url>
			<author_list><author>
				<first_name>Maryam</first_name>
				<middle_name></middle_name>
				<last_name>Ansari</last_name>
				<suffix></suffix>
				<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
				<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
				<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
				<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
				<email>dr.nma76@yahoo.com</email>
				<code>115038</code>
				<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
				<affiliation>School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.</affiliation>
				<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
				 </author><author>
				<first_name>Marzieh</first_name>
				<middle_name></middle_name>
				<last_name>Alikhasi</last_name>
				<suffix></suffix>
				<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
				<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
				<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
				<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
				<email>malikhasi@sina.tums.ac.ir</email>
				<code>115039</code>
				<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
				<affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran</affiliation>
				<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
				 </author><author>
				<first_name>Negin</first_name>
				<middle_name></middle_name>
				<last_name>Yaghoobi</last_name>
				<suffix></suffix>
				<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
				<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
				<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
				<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
				<email>neginya1991@gmail.com</email>
				<code>115040</code>
				<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
				<affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran</affiliation>
				<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
				 </author><author>
				<first_name>Nikfam</first_name>
				<middle_name></middle_name>
				<last_name>Khoshkhounejad</last_name>
				<suffix></suffix>
				<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
				<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
				<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
				<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
				<email>n.khoshkhounejad@gmail.com</email>
				<code>115041</code>
				<coreauthor>Yes</coreauthor>
				<affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran</affiliation>
				<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
				 </author></author_list>
				</article><article>
				<language>en</language>
				<article_id_issn></article_id_issn>
				<article_id_issn_online></article_id_issn_online>
				<article_id_pubmed></article_id_pubmed>
				<article_id_pii></article_id_pii>
				<article_id_doi></article_id_doi>
				<article_id_iranmedex></article_id_iranmedex>
				<article_id_magiran></article_id_magiran>
				<article_id_sid></article_id_sid>
				<title_fa></title_fa>
				<title>Impact of glide path preparation and instrument motion on dentinal crack formation after root canal preparation</title>
				<subject_fa></subject_fa>
				<subject></subject>
				<content_type_fa></content_type_fa>
				<content_type>Original Article</content_type>
				<abstract_fa><![CDATA[]]></abstract_fa>
				<abstract><![CDATA[Objective: This study investigated the effect of glide path preparation and different instruments in creating dentinal cracks during root canal instrumentation.Methods: Eighty maxillary molars were divided into four groups (n=20). The mesiobuccal root canals were prepared using two rotary systems (Group 1: Hyflex EDM and Group 2: ProTaper Gold) and two reciprocating systems (Group 3: WaveOne Gold and Group 4: Reciproc Blue R25). In each group, ten specimens were prepared using the designated glide path files. Methylene blue dye was injected into the root canals to highlight dentinal cracks. The samples were then sectioned and examined under a microscope to count the number of dentinal cracks at the apical, middle, and coronal thirds. The data were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests (P&lt;0.05).Results: When glide path files were not used, the number of cracks was comparable across the groups in coronal, middle and apical sections (P&gt;0.05). Among the samples prepared with glide path files, those instrumented with WaveOne Gold showed a significantly higher number of dentinal cracks in the coronal section compared to ProTaper Gold (P&lt;0.05), and in the middle section compared to both HyFlex EDM and ProTaper Gold (P&lt;0.05). In the apical section, no significant difference in the number of cracks was observed among the groups (P=0.627).Conclusions: Glide path preparation with rotary systems (ProTaper Gold and HyFlex EDM) resulted in fewer dentinal cracks in the mesiobuccal root canals of maxillary molars compared to a reciprocating system (WaveOne Gold).]]></abstract>
				<keyword_fa></keyword_fa>
				<keyword>Dental Pulp Cavity, Path file, Reciprocal systems, Root canal preparation, Root Canal Therapy, Tooth crack</keyword>
				<start_page>102</start_page>
				<end_page>107</end_page>
				<web_url>https://jdmt.mums.ac.ir/article_26211.html</web_url>
			<author_list><author>
				<first_name>Maryam</first_name>
				<middle_name></middle_name>
				<last_name>Forghani</last_name>
				<suffix></suffix>
				<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
				<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
				<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
				<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
				<email>forghaniradm@mums.ac.ir</email>
				<code>115070</code>
				<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
				<affiliation>Dental Research center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.</affiliation>
				<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
				 </author><author>
				<first_name>Maryam</first_name>
				<middle_name></middle_name>
				<last_name>Gharechahi</last_name>
				<suffix></suffix>
				<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
				<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
				<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
				<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
				<email>gharechahim@mums.ac.ir</email>
				<code>115071</code>
				<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
				<affiliation>Dental Research center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.</affiliation>
				<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
				 </author><author>
				<first_name>Fatemeh</first_name>
				<middle_name></middle_name>
				<last_name>Bonyadimanesh</last_name>
				<suffix></suffix>
				<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
				<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
				<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
				<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
				<email>saeedifa0@gmail.com</email>
				<code>115072</code>
				<coreauthor>Yes</coreauthor>
				<affiliation>North Khorasan University of Medical Sciences,Bojnurd, Iran.</affiliation>
				<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
				 </author></author_list>
				</article><article>
				<language>en</language>
				<article_id_issn></article_id_issn>
				<article_id_issn_online></article_id_issn_online>
				<article_id_pubmed></article_id_pubmed>
				<article_id_pii></article_id_pii>
				<article_id_doi></article_id_doi>
				<article_id_iranmedex></article_id_iranmedex>
				<article_id_magiran></article_id_magiran>
				<article_id_sid></article_id_sid>
				<title_fa></title_fa>
				<title>Antifungal effect of Citrus reticulata essential oil and extracts on Candida species</title>
				<subject_fa></subject_fa>
				<subject></subject>
				<content_type_fa></content_type_fa>
				<content_type>Original Article</content_type>
				<abstract_fa><![CDATA[]]></abstract_fa>
				<abstract><![CDATA[Objective: This in vitro study evaluated the antifungal activity of Citrus reticulata (tangerine) peel essential oil and extracts against various Candida species.Methods: The essential oil and aqueous and alcoholic extracts of Citrus reticulata were prepared at 50% and 90% concentrations. Candida albicans, Candida glabrata, and Candida krusei were cultured on Sabouraud dextrose agar with turbidity standardized to 0.5 McFarland. Growth inhibition zones were measured and compared to 0.2% chlorhexidine (positive control) and normal saline (negative control). The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum fungicidal concentration (MFC) of the 90% essential oil were also determined against the microorganisms.Results: The 50% essential oil and both 50% and 90% concentrations of aqueous and alcoholic extracts showed no antifungal activity. The 90% essential oil produced inhibition zones of 6.5 ± 0.5 mm for C. albicans, 10.5 ± 0.5 mm for C. glabrata, and 10.0 ± 1.0 mm for C. krusei, all significantly smaller than those of chlorhexidine (17.0 ± 0.2 mm, 15.0 ± 0.3 mm, and 17.0 ± 0.2 mm, respectively; P&lt;0.05). MIC values were 1/8 for C. albicans, 1/32 for C. glabrata, and 1/4 for C. krusei (based on 90% concentration). The essential oil was fungicidal only against C. albicans (MFC: 1/2 concentration) and fungistatic against the other two species.Conclusions: The 90% Citrus reticulata essential oil effectively formed inhibition zones against C. albicans, C. glabrata, and C. krusei, although to a lower extent than chlorhexidine. The 90% Citrus reticulata essential oil had a fungicidal effect only on C. albicans.]]></abstract>
				<keyword_fa></keyword_fa>
				<keyword>Antifungal agents, Citrus reticulata, Candida albicans, Candida glabrata, Candida Krusei, Oral candidiasis</keyword>
				<start_page>107</start_page>
				<end_page>113</end_page>
				<web_url>https://jdmt.mums.ac.ir/article_26212.html</web_url>
			<author_list><author>
				<first_name>Zahra</first_name>
				<middle_name></middle_name>
				<last_name>Namazi</last_name>
				<suffix></suffix>
				<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
				<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
				<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
				<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
				<email>zahra.t.namazi@gmail.com</email>
				<code>115078</code>
				<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
				<affiliation>Department of Dental Biomaterials, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.</affiliation>
				<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
				 </author><author>
				<first_name>Milad</first_name>
				<middle_name></middle_name>
				<last_name>Hadadi</last_name>
				<suffix></suffix>
				<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
				<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
				<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
				<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
				<email>miladhadadi1427@gmail.com</email>
				<code>115079</code>
				<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
				<affiliation>Dentist, Tehran, Iran.</affiliation>
				<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
				 </author><author>
				<first_name>Zahra</first_name>
				<middle_name></middle_name>
				<last_name>Yadegari</last_name>
				<suffix></suffix>
				<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
				<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
				<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
				<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
				<email>z_yadegari@yahoo.com</email>
				<code>115080</code>
				<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
				<affiliation>Department of Dental Biomaterials, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.</affiliation>
				<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
				 </author><author>
				<first_name>Homa</first_name>
				<middle_name></middle_name>
				<last_name>Mirzaei</last_name>
				<suffix></suffix>
				<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
				<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
				<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
				<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
				<email>homamirzaei87@gmail.com</email>
				<code>115081</code>
				<coreauthor>Yes</coreauthor>
				<affiliation>Department of Oral Medicine, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.</affiliation>
				<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
				 </author><author>
				<first_name>Jamileh Bigom</first_name>
				<middle_name></middle_name>
				<last_name>Taheri</last_name>
				<suffix></suffix>
				<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
				<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
				<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
				<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
				<email>jm_taheri2006@yahoo.com</email>
				<code>115082</code>
				<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
				<affiliation>Department of Oral Medicine, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.</affiliation>
				<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
				 </author><author>
				<first_name>Zahra</first_name>
				<middle_name></middle_name>
				<last_name>Moadab Shoar</last_name>
				<suffix></suffix>
				<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
				<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
				<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
				<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
				<email>zahra_modab@yahoo.com</email>
				<code>115083</code>
				<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
				<affiliation>Dentist, Tehran, Iran.</affiliation>
				<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
				 </author><author>
				<first_name>Melika</first_name>
				<middle_name></middle_name>
				<last_name>Hoseinzadeh</last_name>
				<suffix></suffix>
				<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
				<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
				<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
				<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
				<email>hoseinzadehmel@gmail.com</email>
				<code>115084</code>
				<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
				<affiliation>Dentist, Mashhad, Iran.</affiliation>
				<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
				 </author></author_list>
				</article>
			</articleset>
			</journal>