Synchronization of Calcifying Odontogenic Cyst and Aneurysmal Bone Cyst: A Case Report

Document Type: Case Report/Series

Authors

1 1.Dental Materials Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran 2.Professor, Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, School of Dentistry, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.

3 Postgraduate Student, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.

4 Assistant Professor , Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, Dentistry Research Center, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran.

Abstract

Although aneurysmal bone cysts and calcifying odontogenic cysts accompanied with other lesions are reported in the literature, the simultaneous occurrence of these two distinct lesions has not been reported. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report describing co-occurrence of these two lesions located in the left mandibular ramusin a 36-year-old woman.
 
 
 

Keywords

Main Subjects


Introduction

Calcifying odontogenic cyst (COC) or calcifying cystic odontogenic tumor (CCOT) is one of the ghost cell odontogenic lesions that mostly grows as a cystic lesion. Based on the current WHO classification system, these lesions can also have a solid or malignant nature (1).

COCs mainly occur in the anterior areas of both jaws and generally account for about 2% of all the jaw cysts (2).

Although these painless, slow-growing lesions affect people across a wide age range, most cases are diagnosed in the second decade of life and do not demonstrate a gender predilection (3). Histopathologically, COCs have a fibrous capsule and lined with odontogenic epithelium.

The main characteristic of these lesions is the presence of a ghost cells within the epithelial lining (1).

Radiographically, COCs show a wide variety of internal structures. It may appears completely radiolucent or demonstrate calcified materials in the radiolucent area. Multilocular appearance is rare (4). 

 Aneurysmal bone cyst (ABC) is an intraosseous pseudocyst that can be created de novo or as a secondary lesion arising in association with
other bone lesions (1).

 ABCs essentially occur in long
bones and vertebrae. Only 1.9% of all ABCs arise in the jaws. The body and
ramus of the mandible are the most affected areas by these lesions (5).

ABC mostly manifests itself in the first two decades of life with a slight inclination towards females (4). Microscopically, the particular feature of ABC is blood-filled cavities without endothelial or epithelial lining (1). The
typical radiographic appearance is that of a multilocular with wispy, ill-defined bony septa. A desire to make an extreme expansion of the outer cortical plates is characteristic of this lesion (4).

Here, we describe the first case of COC in association with ABC in a 36-year-old woman.

 

Case Report

A 36-year-old woman presented with the chief complaint of tenderness on the lingual surface of the left for four months. Overlying mucosa was normal and there were
no signs of inflammation, bleeding, pus discharge, expansion or facial asymmetry (Fig.1). The patient's medical history was unremarkable.

The orthopantomograph and cone beam computed tomographic (CBCT) images showed a multilocular radiolucent lesion located in the left mandibular ramus (Fig.2, 3).

An excisional biopsy was done. Macroscopically, the specimen consisted of three pieces of soft tissue ranging in size from 14 x 4 x 4 mm to 15 x 10 x 5 mm with cream to brown color and elastic consistency and a piece of hard tissue with brown color which measured 5 x 4 x 2 mm.

Histopathologic examination showed a cystic cavity lined with three to multiple layers of columnar basal cells that resembled ameloblastoma and superficial stellate reticulum like cells.

Based on clinical, radiographic and histopathological findings of the lesion, unicystic ameloblastoma and calcifying odontogenic cyst type I (ameloblastic type) were included as differential diagnosis (Fig. 4A-D).

The lesion was then completely resected in a specimen measuring 70 x 45 x 18 mm that extended from the mesial edge of the mandibular left second molar to the left mandibular ramus and coronoid process (Fig. 5). The condylar head and neck were preserved.

Microscopically, several slices from a tissue sample revealed two distinct lesions. Some slices of the specimen demonstrated a pathologic cavity lined by multiple layers of odontogenic epithelial cells in company whit ghost cells, areas of calcification and juxta-epithelial
hyalinization. These features were consistent with a calcifying odontogenic cyst (Fig. 4A-D). Other slices showed loose connective tissue, chronic inflammatory cells, foreign body giant cells and vascular spaces filled with red blood cells. These characteristics were clearly demonstrated the aneurysmal bone cyst (Fig. 6A-D).

Finally, the histopathological diagnosis of calcifying odontogenic cyst in association with aneurysmal bone cyst was made. There was no recurrence after the one year follow-up and no significant complications were noted in patient (Fig. 7).

 

 


 

Figure 1. Intra oral photograph.

.

 

Figure 2. Panoramic image of multilacunar radiolucency occupying the left mandibular ramus.

 

 

 

 

Figure 3. Axial CBCT showing a multilocular lesion at the left ramus of the mandible with thinning of the lingual cortex

 

 

 

 

Figure 4. Macroscopic view of the surgical resection.

 

 

 

 

Figure 5. (A) The epithelial lining of the calcifying cystic odontogenic tumor displays palisading of the basal layer, proliferation of epithelial cells towards the cyst lumen and Ghost cells in the cystic epithelium. (B) Juxtaepithelial hyalinization. (C) Numerous calcified particles and (D) ghost cells are present adjacent to the epithelial lining of COC.

 

 

 

 

Figure 6.  Microscopic examination of the ABC showing cystic spaces filled with red blood cells (A,B), giant cells, loose connective tissue(C), and hemosiderophages(D).

 

 

 

Figure 7. Postoperative panoramic radiographs after one year follow up.

 

 


Discussion

After introducing calcifying odontogenic cyst as a distinct lesion by Gorlin et al. in 1962, discord and dissension have prevailed regarding its nature (6, 7). This lesion has been considered as a developmental odontogenic cyst or a solid lesion with neoplastic nature (8).

The concomitance of COC and other odontogenic tumors is frequent. COCs in association with odontoma, ameloblastoma, adenomatoid odontogenic tumor, odontoameloblastoma, ameloblastic fibroma, ameloblastic fibro-odontoma, odontogenic myxofibroma and orthokeratinized odontogenic cyst have been reported (9).

Aneurysmal bone cyst was first defined by Jaffe and Lichtenstein in 1942 and has been regarded as a reactive process. Although primary ABCs are mesenchymal neoplasm, secondary ABCs which are associated with other bone lesions such as cement-ossifying fibroma, ossifying fibroma, giant cell tumor, chondroblastoma, osteoblastoma, fibrous dysplasia and dentigerous cyst, aren't considered as a neoplastic process (10-12).

The exact etiology of secondary ABC is unknown, although there are studies suggest that vascular disrupting due to the primary lesion growth and degeneration of pre-existing lesions could lead to creation of ABCs (13, 14).  

This paper presents an incomparable combination of calcifying cystic odontogenic tumor and aneurysmal bone cyst, so we have no previous data to make comparisons across the same entities. With regard to age and gender of COC and ABC, patients' age and gender were compatible with both lesions.

Concerning the current location of the COCs, the occurrence of a lesion in the posterior mandibular area was
unusual. However, ramus is a common area for ABCs. Expansion, which is the main symptom of ABC, didn’t exist in this case. ABCs may occasionally accompanied by tenderness, same the present case. Multilacunar appearance can be rare in COCs, but common in ABCs.

COCs are cured by simple enucleation of the lesion and when they are present associated with other lesions; the treatment is based on the associated lesion (15).

In the present case, the ABC was located behind the COC and not included in the biopsy, so both the pathologist and the surgeon weren’t aware of this lesion. The surgeon compelled to do en bloc resection because suddenly confronted with a hemorrhagic lesion. As ABCs are associated with a higher risk of
recurrent, resection is safer than simple curettage for treatment (4).

Only a small percentage of secondary ABCs had the radiological appearance of aneurysmal bone cyst; in the other cases the associated lesion dominated the radiographic view (16).

In addition, biopsy specimens are often taken from part of a lesion, so they may show the features of only one lesion and a concomitant lesion may be missed. Therefore, An accurate diagnosis and proper treatment planning requires a close collaboration between the radiologist, the surgeon and the pathologist.

 

Acknowledgment

We would like to acknowledge Dr. Mohammad Ali Graeeli for introducing this case and performing a surgical procedure and Dr. Adineh Javadian Langroodi for providing the radiographic images.

1. Neville BW, Damm DD, Chi AC, Allen CM. Oral and maxillofacial pathology. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2015.

2. Saghafi S, Zare-Mahmoodabadi R, Salehinejad J, Kadeh H, Afzal-Aghaee M. (2010). Immunohistochemical analysis of p53 and PCNA expression in calcifying odontogenic cyst. J Oral Sci. 52(4):609-13.

3. Habibi A, Saghravanian N, Salehinejad J, Jafarzadeh H. (2011). Thirty years clinicopathological study of 60 calcifying cystic odontogenic tumors in Iranian population. J Contemp Dent Pract. 12(3):171-3.

4. White SC, Pharoah MJ. Oral Radiology: Principles and Interpretation.  Elsevier Health Sciences; 2014.

5. Motamedi MH, Ebrahimi A, Behroozian A, Kargahi N, Rasouli HR.(2014). Maxillofacial Aneurysmal Bone Cysts in Isfahan 1987-2013: A Clinicohistopathological Study of 16 Casest.  Oral Hyg Health. 2(155):2332-0702.

6. Gorlin RJ, Pindborg JJ, Clausen FP, Vickers RA. (1962).The calcifying odontogenic cyst—a possible analogue of the cutaneous calcifying epithelioma of Malherbe: an analysis of fifteen cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 15(10):1235-43.

7. Shear M. Developmental odontogenic cysts. (1994). An update. J Oral Pathol Med. 23(1):1-11.

8. Toida M. (1998). So‐called calcifying odontogenic cyst: review and discussion on the terminology and classification. J Oral Pathol Med. 27(2):49-52.

9. Chindasombatjaroen J, Poomsawat S, Klongnoi B. (2012). Calcifying cystic odontogenic tumor associated with other lesions: case report with cone-beam computed tomography findings.Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 113(3):414-20.

10. Oliveira AM, Perez-Atayde AR, Inwards CY, Medeiros F, Derr V, Hsi BL, et al.(2004) USP6 and CDH11 oncogenes identify the neoplastic cell in primary aneurysmal bone cysts and are absent in so-called secondary aneurysmal bone cysts. Am J Pathol. 165 (5):1773-80.

11. Arora SS, Paul S, Arora S, Kapoor V. (2014). Secondary jaw aneurysmal bone cyst (JABC)–a possible misnomer? A review of literature on secondary JABCs, their pathogenesis and oncogenesis. J Oral Pathol Med. 43(9):647-51.

12. Nadimi H, Bronny AT, Singoli A, Gatti WM, Hasiakos P. (1987). Aneurysmal bone cyst associated with a dentigerous cyst: Report of case. J Am Dent Assoc. 115(6):859-61.

13. Öner M, Yurdakul E, Durukan P. (2012). Aneursymal Bone Cyst Causing a Femoral Neck Fracture: A Pediatric Case.  JAEMCR.1; 3(4).

14. Devi P, Thimmarasa VB, Mehrotra V, Agarwal M. (2011). Aneurysmal bone cyst of the mandible: A case report and review of literature. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 15 (1):105-108.

15. de Fátima Bernardes V, de Lacerda JC, de Aguiar MC, Gomez RS.(2008). Calcifying odontogenic cyst associated with an orthokeratinized odontogenic cyst. Head Neck Pathol. 2(4):324-7.

16. Bonakdarpour A, Levy WM, Aegerter E. (1978). Primary and Secondary Aneurysmal Bone Cyst: A Radiological Study of 75 Cases. Radiology. 126(1):75-83.